In class this week we started getting into different definitions and dramatic structures, in particular when it comes to sitcoms.
Before I get too far into these, I do better re-writing terminology to help me remember.
Story - all that is in the events, including implied events.
Narrative - The telling of the story, how it is told - it is associated with the plot.
Diagesis - the world of the story - anything involved.
Diagesis element - something in the world (e.g., harmonica player in Jaws)
Non-diagetic element - in the story's world, but something the actors do not see/hear, etc. (e.g. theme music, credits, etc)
Main point- considered the "A-story"
Sub-plot - the "B-story"
We spoke of about several several models used in drama, such Gustav Freytag's Dramatic Pyramid:
Climax
Rising Action Falling Action
Exposition inciting incident resolution denouement
***This model is flexible and can be altered based on the actual story.
Syd Field's Screenplay (1979)
Act I (A) (B) Act II (C) Act III (D)
Set-up Confrontation Resoution
A) inciting incident
B) confrontation
C) crisis
D) Climax
** B and C are plot points that spin the story into a new direction.
Act I = 30 pages, Act II = 60 pages, Act III = 30 pages
Out of the two of these models, I believe Field's screenplay model makes more sense and is more accurate to the shows we are used to watching these days. I feel this due to the fact that the crisis is a peak of its own in Field's model, where the crisis is not so distinctly established in Freytag's model. The climax to me, is an essential part of the show which culminates in a climax that you are prepared and ready for as on observer. In addition, soon after the climax a resolution is made and the episodes quickly end. Although the Freytag model is flexible, I believe Field's is more accurate to the way the audience may prefer their sitcoms to me made.
As an example, we were shown an episode of "Project Runway." A show I had never before seen. I was shockingly unsurprised at the amount of drama that immediately showed itself in the opening scenes of the show, and knew it would undoubtedly be present the entire episode. The great part about the show was the the A-stoy was easy to find. Contestants battle each other to win a grand prize at the end of the entire competition. Unfortunately, I could not for the life of me keep up with the sub-stories. I venture to say that our alphabet does not contain enough letters to categorize the sub-plots in such a show. There were sub-plots within the episodes, sub-plots within the challenges, with the host, with several contestants, with individuals, and so on. The sub-plots were everywhere, which I'm sure is one of the reasons this show is so successful. People love drama. It was quite evident the producers focused on certain story lines and fed into the drama of it all.
The Sitcom Structure
The good 1st obstacle worse even worse! twist and turn success?
Act I Act II
"tree" "a beehive" "bees and stuck" "stung, allergic" "rains, wet/stuck""get down"
Blow - Final act where scene climaxes, could also be the "blow" of the entire show
*for this, remember the blow pertains to comedy sitcoms only - it refers to the main one-liners, etc that make scene/show funny; changes the mood*